Skip to content

HYPERFLEET-1221 - chore: update OWNERS file#60

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift-hyperfleet:mainfrom
rh-amarin:sync-owners-template
Jun 11, 2026
Merged

HYPERFLEET-1221 - chore: update OWNERS file#60
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift-hyperfleet:mainfrom
rh-amarin:sync-owners-template

Conversation

@rh-amarin

@rh-amarin rh-amarin commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Test plan

  • Verify all approvers and reviewers match hyperfleet-api-spec-template/OWNERS

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from mbrudnoy and sherine-k June 11, 2026 09:01
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 400f3c04-ed35-4dcf-ab5a-2565f464321c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9972bb9 and a35c0fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • openshift-hyperfleet/architecture (manual)
  • openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-api (manual)
  • openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-sentinel (manual)
  • openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-adapter (manual)
  • openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-broker (manual)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • OWNERS
📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

This pull request contains only internal team management updates to the project configuration and has no user-facing changes or new features. No release notes are applicable for end-users.

Walkthrough

Updated the OWNERS file to modify the approvers and reviewers lists. Removed four GitHub handles (86254860, xueli181114, yasun1, yingzhanredhat) and added ldornele and mliptak0 to both sections. The resulting approver and reviewer sets are now synchronized with the new handles.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 11
✅ Passed checks (11 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating the OWNERS file to sync with the canonical template source.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the sync of the OWNERS file with hyperfleet-api-spec-template and providing test verification criteria.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Sec-02: Secrets In Log Output ✅ Passed No log statements (slog, logr, zap, fmt.Print*) found in any non-test Go files. Repository contains only TypeSpec API definitions and configuration changes with no secret-containing logs.
No Hardcoded Secrets ✅ Passed OWNERS file contains only YAML with public GitHub usernames. No hardcoded secrets, API keys, tokens, passwords, base64 strings >32 chars, or credential URLs detected.
No Weak Cryptography ✅ Passed PR modifies only OWNERS file (configuration). Repository contains no cryptographic code—only TypeSpec API specs and schema embedding. No banned primitives (MD5, DES, RC4, SHA1 for security), ECB mo...
No Injection Vectors ✅ Passed PR only modifies OWNERS configuration file with no code changes. No SQL concatenation (CWE-89), exec.Command with user input (CWE-78), template.HTML injection (CWE-79), or unsafe yaml.Unmarshal (CW...
No Privileged Containers ✅ Passed PR modifies only configuration metadata (OWNERS file and TypeSpec API definitions). No Kubernetes/OpenShift manifests, Helm templates, or Dockerfiles modified. No containers deployed. Check not app...
No Pii Or Sensitive Data In Logs ✅ Passed PR modifies only OWNERS file with GitHub usernames. No logging statements found in code or workflows. No PII, credentials, or sensitive data exposed in logs.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@rh-amarin rh-amarin changed the title chore: update OWNERS file HYPERFLEET-1221 - chore: update OWNERS file Jun 11, 2026
@rh-amarin rh-amarin force-pushed the sync-owners-template branch from 9972bb9 to a35c0fe Compare June 11, 2026 09:46
ciaranRoche
ciaranRoche approved these changes Jun 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

@ciaranRoche ciaranRoche left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ciaranRoche

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit df34900 into openshift-hyperfleet:main Jun 11, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ciaranRoche ciaranRoche ciaranRoche approved these changes

@mbrudnoy mbrudnoy Awaiting requested review from mbrudnoy

@sherine-k sherine-k Awaiting requested review from sherine-k

Assignees

@ciaranRoche ciaranRoche

Labels

approved lgtm

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rh-amarin @ciaranRoche